Drone laws: changing regulatory emphasis

Admissions Manipulation: A Future Risk to Australian Higher Education? – Emerging Risk Report: Issue 83
July 29, 2019
Reputational Risk Lessons: Part 2 What we can learn from Facebook’s public problems
August 6, 2019
Admissions Manipulation: A Future Risk to Australian Higher Education? – Emerging Risk Report: Issue 83
July 29, 2019
Reputational Risk Lessons: Part 2 What we can learn from Facebook’s public problems
August 6, 2019

Drone laws: changing regulatory emphasis

We recently wrote about drone risks and Unimutual cover as well as published an Emerging Risk Report that addressed the shift of remotely piloted aircrafts from the experimental stage to mainstream use.

Drones have rapidly expanded in popularity over the past years, growing faster than regulation has been able to keep up with. They are now being used for a range of purposes including military, commercial, agricultural, and recreational use. Drone spending in Australia from FY17-FY21 is estimated to reach USD $3.1BN according to Goldman Sachs & Co.

Legal firm Sparke Helmore Lawyers have written an article detailing the 2019 reforms to drone regulation. Read it below (or to share, download it here) for information on these changes and how they impact both commercial and recreational users and potentially your campus.

Changing regulatory emphasis – drone laws

By Marianne Robinson, Special Counsel & Sally Weatherstone, Partner

Drones are now being used for a variety of commercial purposes ranging from shark patrols, lifesaving, real estate sales, surveying, mining, insurance claims assessments, food, pharmacy deliveries and agriculture. There is even the prospect of unmanned passenger flights.

Since 2016 Australian regulation of the drone industry has concentrated on the licensing requirements for commercial operators and pilots, as well as on the drone weight rather than on the drone itself. Recreational and commercial users of drones less than 2 kg have been excluded from regulation. By 2017 it was estimated that of the 60,000 drone users in Australia, 50,000 did not require pilot licences because they were recreational users or commercial pilots operating outside the licensing requirements.

The increased use of drones for a variety of purposes ranging from shark patrols, lifesaving, real estate sales, surveying, mining, insurance claims assessments, food and pharmacy deliveries, agriculture and the prospect of unmanned passenger flights has given rise to a review of the regulation of drones and drone operators.

Existing RPA laws

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) administers Part 101 of the Civil Aviation Authority Regulations 1998, which regulates unmanned aircraft. As a regulator, CASA’s emphasis is on creating a regulatory framework that protects the safety of people, property and users of air space. It has applied this emphasis to the regulation of drones.

Since 2016, operators have been permitted to use Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAs) without either an operator or controller certificate, which means no formal training or safety education is required unless the RPA is flown for commercial purposes. If flown for commercial reasons, then an aviation reference number is required. Private landowners can carry out commercial-like operations on their own land using RPAs up to 25 kg so long as the parties receive no remuneration and the standard operating conditions apply. This means the RPA must be operated within visual line of sight and below 120 metres. Additional rules apply in prohibited or restricted areas, such as over populous areas within 5.5 kilometres of a controlled aerodrome. This can include festivals, sporting ovals, populated beaches, parks, busy roads and footpaths.

Since 2015, CASA has only issued nine infringement notices with three offenders each being fined between $850-$900. One of the issues has been CASA’s difficulty in identifying the offences in RPAs or other operators as there is no register of drones or drone owners.

What is changing in 2019?

Since 2016 the emphasis on the operator and the operator’s knowledge and training has been the main focus of regulation. The 2019 reforms impact on both commercial and recreational users.

After consultation with various parties, CASA has announced that it plans to introduce a drone registration and accreditation scheme later in 2019 that will apply (with certain exceptions) to:

  • Drones weighing more than 250 grams operated recreationally, and
  • all drones operated commercially regardless of weight.

Key parts of the changes include:

  • flyers under 16 years of age will need to be supervised by someone 18 years or older who is accredited by CASA
  • the accreditation process will be in the form of an online education course to make sure the flyer knows the rules – basically, watching video and answering a quiz
  • there will be a registration fee imposed for recreational flyers (less than $20)
  • there will be a registration fee for commercial flyers registration, which is likely to be from $100 to $160 per drone, and
  • the registration process requires the registration of the drone itself as well as the flyer.

The changes are implemented by amendments to Part 101 (Unmanned Aircraft and Rockets) Manual of Standards 2019 issued by CASA in April 2019. Part 101 was first issued in 2001 for unmanned aircraft and rockets before drone usage became popular.

Impact on all flyers

For the first time there will be a registration process for a drone used by all flyers, which means that it will be possible to track drones and identify the number of flyers ( commercial and recreational) but also offending flyers once CASA has developed a real time network that can do this. This development will be of interest to local government, parks and wildlife and a range of other entities concerned with the use of drones in their jurisdictions.

Impact on commercial operators

Two of the new rules impacting on commercial drone operators include:

  • specific requirements for the approval of the operation of a drone when the pilot cannot see the aircraft – extended visual line of sight operations, and
  • requiring a “buffer” between the device and the controlled space above it.

Commercial pilots can receive approval for an operation within no-fly areas of a non-controlled aerodrome under specific conditions. Over the next 12 months new rules impacting on training and competency standards for remote pilot licences and standing approvals for certain kinds of flights near aerodromes will come into effect. Over the next 18 months new requirements for commercial drone pilot instructors will also come into operation.

CASA approved drone safety app

On 3 July 2019 CASA announced that its new RPAs digital platform is now available for all recreational and commercial drone operators to download and use. It is intended that this new platform will also:

  • integrate with CASA’s proposed drone registration system
  • allow licenced operators to submit flight authorisation requests
  • automate approvals to operate within 3 NM of a controlled aerodrome, where safe to do so, and
  • provide the building blocks for a future RPA traffic management system.

More information on the drone app can be obtained from www.casa.gov.au/droneapp.

For help in working through the new regulatory world of drones please contact us.

Copyright 2019 © Sparke Helmore. This publication is not legal advice. It is not intended to be comprehensive. You should seek specific professional advice before acting on the basis of anything in this publication.

For more information on drones, read our Emerging Risk Report about the risks of drone use reaching commercial critical mass; the increasing prevalence of autonomous/driverless vehicles; and sexual assault on campus.

Show sharing buttons
Hide sharing buttons